Moonbat + Amazongate = Prize Pillock

There’s only one thing more satisfying than being right. That’s when a shrill buffoon you utterly despise dedicates an entire column in a newspaper you loathe to accusing you of being wrong, working himself up into an almost masturbatory lather of slobbering indignation, macheting himself to ever greater heights of ecstatic fervour like some Shi’ite penitent during Ashura, giggling at his jokes, crowing at his own cleverness, earning all sorts of smarmy plaudits from his coterie of sorry eco-fascist brown-nosers – and it turns out, after all that, you’re still entirely right and the buffoon – let’s call him Moonbat – has emerged looking an even bigger prat than ever.

(to read more, click here)

4 thoughts on “Moonbat + Amazongate = Prize Pillock”

  1. Yes, it does turn out that there are no real basis in peer reviewed papers for the claims of the IPCC over the Amazon’s alleged sensitivity to warming. Besides which, this is all besides the point as mankind has no significant influence over the weather or climate, at all!!

    See the excellent Watts Up With that site for more information on the Amazongate debacle.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/27/booker-north-and-willis-on-the-ipcc-amazongate-affair/

    and this more detailled article that looks at the actual data.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/27/out-in-the-ama-zone/

    This shows the rainfall has not changed (other than noise in the data) over the last 100 years, in fact the past decade shows higher than average rainfall. So much for alleged warming threatening the Amazon by drought!

  2. Now Richard North has gone through 2 versions of the study and still found no 30/40% will the “Shrill Buffoon” be apologizing to Dr North, Mr Booker and yourself James?

    Trust me, I will not hold my breath but I bet he goes extremely quite on the subject.

    I am actually glad the Times did cowardly retract the article….as you said, “Moonbat – has emerged looking an even bigger prat than ever” LMAO

  3. Yes, it does turn out that there are no real basis in peer reviewed papers for the claims of the IPCC over the Amazon’s alleged sensitivity to warming. Besides which, this is all besides the point as mankind has no significant influence over the weather or climate, at all!!

    See the excellent Watts Up With that site for more information on the Amazongate debacle.

    h t t p://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/27/booker-north-and-willis-on-the-ipcc-amazongate-affair/

    and this more detailled article that looks at the actual data.

    h t t p ://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/27/out-in-the-ama-zone/

    This shows the rainfall has not changed (other than noise in the data) over the last 100 years, in fact the past decade shows higher than average rainfall. So much for alleged warming threatening the Amazon by drought!

  4. remove the spaces between the h the t the t and the p. I had to do that to get the link passed the automatic moderator.

Comments are closed.